Towards a Progressive neo-Hasidism
psalm &
Is This Prayer?
Judith Chalmer
February 26, 2024
Birds . /Jessica Tamar Deutsch/
psalm
i saw you the other day but i didn’t speak.
who was i, after all? and what would it mean,
your looking back? every day i repeat this
path, walking along the water. across the lake,
clouds nestle beneath the peaks and the peaks
break over the clouds like powder,
as if it weren’t the gloom or a mist there,
but the mountains themselves thinning, becoming
transparent. why does this comfort me?
i wouldn’t mind my disappearance
if it were something like this gentle tempering—
boulders, mountains with names, whole ranges softened.
peach and vermillion stream across the sky
and are gone in minutes. who am i,
to hope you would console me? i, who want
only to melt into your world, not leave it.
​
Is This Prayer?
What makes me think, though, that the region of my soul in which all
this activity’s occurring
is a site which God might consider an engaging or even acceptable
spiritual location?
C.K. Williams, “The Vessel”
But is the soul so divided? And are we doomed to the usual template, one
region getting prayer and the others a substandard amount of whatever matters?
Or could prayer move around the way my dog does here on the second-most
traveled path in Red Rocks Park just before the overlook with the skinny railing
(where thank God the dog didn’t fall all the way down that time I didn’t see him
behind me and when I went back, there he was, on a ledge beneath the overhang,
out of reach with no way to get him back up)? Or, what if a region of the soul
could get a false negative result for spiritual activity on God’s test probe
just because of the time, for instance now, on this gloomy, un-soulful day?
There was a patch, just now, of blue sky and it lifted my spirits.
Putting aside, for now, C.K.’s thoughts about God’s thought, what throws me off,
and now that patch of blue sky is gone, by the way, is, if I still want a way to say
I am (or was) grateful, then do I say the blue patch was given to all of us or just
to me? How presumptuous is it to claim to be an “us”? If I lived on a dry plain,
my farm soil cracked, would a blue sky elevate my soul? What about the many,
some even here in the gloom, who wouldn’t want any part of my prayer?
I’m a little baffled by who, when I pray, I am. But, putting aside that
consideration as well, if I just start and let God figure it out, is it the blue
or the light that’s given me a lift? (It’s the blue.) But if I’m grateful for a clear sky,
what about the rest? Shouldn’t I be grateful for the gloom? I’m not that good
at thinking alone (and thank God I’ve still got my dog– I tried to climb down
at the side, where there wasn’t a guardrail, but it was too steep. I couldn’t get close
and that’s when he started to cry and the neighbor who climbed down and back up
with me said I’d have to call the Fire Department, so I got out my phone and
started to dial when suddenly the dog was at my side and the neighbor gently
suggested maybe next time I should follow the law and keep my dog on a leash)
so it kind of feels empty to say I’m grateful for anything, sun, rain, or safekeeping
that sustains only me. But not to ignore him for too long, I wonder if C.K. would say
God enters his soul to get to the region of prayer, or does God, in C.K.’s mind,
just put a straw into the soul and suck the prayer out? All of which brings me
to the physical body and how we’re stuck here inside our separate skins (no wonder
C.K. longs for God, who’s a big one for getting under the skin) and it’s lonely for us
but we can at least understand each other through some magic of receptors and nerves,
and I’m not talking about sex, by the way, so that’s comforting, and now we know
how trees converse so maybe we’re not as separate as it seems and someday
someone will find little filaments that connect us, though that would be too bad
because it’s way more poetic (and better exercise) if our souls can jump through
our skins like God and that’s how we agree on budgets and sewage systems.
It’s lucky, given we’re each an “I,” that we can even perceive each other, and that’s just
the start. There’s more to it, but once you go down that path you get to everyone
you miss, and even if you forget about love and death, there’s so much on the side
like trees and the sky and the way, if you like them, if you even start in
on being thankful for this world, it breaks your poor heart. I worked this out once,
how to form a prayer, with my wife, who would really rather be called my partner
but that would take too long to explain, and now I can’t remember what I decided.
That’s the trouble with personal prayer. My wife (if I may, with her permission,
use, again, a problematic shorthand for a relationship that is deeply nuanced),
who is more spiritual than I (also more efficient with words) says she likes to get
her prayers from the book. They’re catchy - almost like the tune for Kaufman’s
Rye Bread (of the highest qua-li-ty). For her, being agreeably spiritual,
some of the words pop out and she takes them aside for a private romp. No surprise
the dog likes her better than he likes me. Every day she plunks down on the couch
and says to him, “Come here, come here and talk to me.” She’s so cozy and lovable.
I should go home and nuzzle her, and as for God, see problematic, above.
Judith Chalmer
Judith Chalmer’s second book of poems is “Minnow” (Kelsay Books 2020). Her poems have been published in journals such as “Lilith” (winner Newberger Prize) and “Poetica,” and in anthologies such as “Roads Taken: Contemporary Vermont Poets” and “Queer Nature.” She is also co-translator of two books of haiku and tanka with author, Michiko Oishi. She is the recipient of the Vermont Arts Council’s Williams Award for Meritorious Service in the Arts and currently serves on the board of Vermont Humanities. In 2023 she attended the inaugural Yetzirah Jewish Poetry Conference as a scholar and is organizing a gathering of Jewish poets in Vermont inspired by that experience.